Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Mapping knowledge domains: characterizing PNAS.
A review of data mining and analysis techniques that can be used for the mapping of knowledge domains is given. Literature mapping techniques can be based on authors, documents, journals, words, and/or indicators. Most mapping questions are related to research assessment or to the structure and dynamics of disciplines or networks. Several mapping techniques are demonstrated on a data set compri...
متن کاملMapping knowledge domains.
T term ‘‘mapping knowledge domains’’ was chosen to describe a newly evolving interdisciplinary area of science aimed at the process of charting, mining, analyzing, sorting, enabling navigation of, and displaying knowledge. This field is aimed at easing information access, making evident the structure of knowledge, and allowing seekers of knowledge to succeed in their endeavors. Although thousan...
متن کاملHistoriographic Mapping of Knowledge Domains Literature
To better understand the topic of this colloquium, we have created a series of databases related to knowledge domains [dynamic systems (small world/Milgram), information visualization (Tufte), co-citation (Small), bibliographic coupling (Kessler), and scientometrics (Scientometrics)]. I have used a software package called HistCite which generates chronological maps of subject (topical) collecti...
متن کاملMapping Topics and Topic Bursts in PNAS
Scientific research is highly dynamic. New areas of science continually evolve; others gain or lose importance, merge, or split. Due to the steady increase in the number of scientific publications, it is hard to keep an overview of the structure and dynamic development of one's own field of science, much less all scientific domains. However, knowledge of "hot" topics, emergent research frontier...
متن کاملPNAS Plus Significance Statements Mapping the stochastic response of nanostructures
A challenge in nanotechnology is that nanoscale structures exhibit a rate-dependent and apparently random (stochastic) load-deflection behavior when repeated experimental measurements are compared. The variability in mechanical response is due to the extreme nonconvexity of the nanostructure’s energy versus structure function. The many minima of this function correspond to equilibrium states, a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
سال: 2004
ISSN: 0027-8424,1091-6490
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0307509100